Form 4s, DEF 14As, and the stories hiding inside them. Weekly.

Every week, executives at public companies disclose buys, sells, comp packages, and material events through SEC filings. The volume is overwhelming. Most of it is procedural. A small slice is signal.

FiledWeekly reads it all and sends you the slice that matters.
Outsized insider sales with context.
Comp packages benchmarked against peers.
Departures and severance worth a closer look.
The patterns across companies that single filings obscure.

Built for fund analysts, journalists, governance researchers, and compliance teams who watch boardroom moves as carefully as price action.

Articles

Apple

+4

Jun 30, 2026

•

3 min read

The Cook Decade

Issue 2: What $1.96 billion of realized executive comp looks like, year by year

Starbucks

+3

Jun 23, 2026

•

3 min read

The Niccol Package, in Hindsight

Issue 1: What twenty-two months of data tells us about Starbucks' $113M turnaround bet

Jun 22, 2026

•

1 min read

Welcome to FiledWeekly

A weekly read on what executives just filed with the SEC, and why most of it doesn't add up the way you'd think

About FiledWeekly

FiledWeekly is the weekly briefing on what executives at public companies just filed with the SEC, and which filings actually matter.

Every week, the SEC publishes thousands of Form 4 insider transactions, hundreds of DEF 14A proxy statements, and 8-K material events covering executive departures, severance, and comp changes. Most of it is procedural. The small slice that matters tends to live in patterns found across filings, not in any single one. A CEO selling during a blackout window. A comp package three standard deviations above peers. A quiet 8-K Item 5.02 that telegraphs a board fight.

FiledWeekly does that pattern work and reports what's worth your time.

The publication is independent, with no outside funding, no enterprise contracts, and no Fortune 500 logos on the homepage. It exists because the audience, fund analysts, journalists, governance researchers, and compliance teams all already have access to EDGAR and are looking for editorial judgment, not raw data.

If there's a company, executive, or filing type you'd like to see covered, hit reply on any issue. The publication is built around what readers ask for.